Lose
your syllabus? Download another one, no
extra charge
Online class help desk | Case abstract example | BerryLaw blog | U.S. Supreme Court blog
>>Course
<<
(it's tentative, so go with the flow)
Class
session |
Topics
& Software |
Texts,
Readings, Resources |
Week
1: Jan. 13
|
Introduction to the course, seminar style, syllabus and Web page
The nature of law? What is law? Philosophies of law
The rule of law | The role of law | "Doing" law
|
Read (for Tuesday): The Nature of Law AND People v. Ceballos | DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of SS
Familiarize yourself with the prof's law blog
|
Week
2: Jan. 19, 21 |
Google mapping the law
Introduction to the USSC (video) & judicial review
>>Meet Tuesday in the library seminar room |
Due by midnight Monday: reaction to BC's blog post at WanderingRocks (Law & Morality)
Read (for next Tuesday): Lewis, introduction & chapters 1-3
|
Week
3: Jan. 26, 28 |
Intro to freedom of press & expression in United States
Evolution of USSC and awareness of the role of the First Amendment
Discuss/brainstorm FIP projects & ideas
Cases for this week:
Barron v. Baltimore | Schenck v. U.S. | Abrams v. U.S. |
Need FIP ideas? Download the Media Reform Action Guide; Visit BerryLaw blog; visit Opposing Views
FIP instructions (Word .doc download)
Due midnight Wednesday: reaction to blog post at Wandering Rocks (Citizens United v. F.E.C.)
|
Week
4: Feb. 2, 4 |
The First Amendment is (re-)born | Sedition - Libel & freedom of the press | FIP discussion
Reading quiz Thursday (meet in LAU 113) | Meet Justice Anton Scalia
Cases for the week:
Stromberg v. California | Whitney v. California |
Gilbert v. Minnesota |
Gitlow v. New York |
Near v. Minnesota | New
York Times v. Sullivan |
Read: Lewis: Chapters 4 & 5; from Free Speech on Trial, the Whitney and Near cases
(for Tuesday) and Times v. Sullivan (for Thursday)
View: the actionable Times ad
Due Thursday, Feb. 4: FIP proposals, solo or group. Typed up, printed out & turned in
(no email).
|
Week
5: Feb. 9, 11 |
Privacy and Freedom of the Expression (First v. Fourth) | Censorship
Just for funsies | Role playing | Washingtonienne (warning: graphic language and descriptions) | Background at Wikipedia | Case notes
Cases for the week:
Time v. Hill | Barber v. Time | Sidis v. F-R Publishing Corp. | Olmstead v. U.S. | Kleindienst v. Mandel |
Read: Lewis, chapter 5; Privacy (.ppt download) | Brandeis and Warren, The Right to Privacy
Due Thursday, Feb. 11: FIP proposal re-submits. Typed up, printed out and turned in
(no email)
>>Georgetown Law panel on Citizens United (audio only); Colbert and Senator Dodd on Citizens United. |
Week
6: Feb. 16, 18 |
Shield law, source confideniality & freedom of the press
Cases for the week:
Branzburg v. Hayes | U.S. v. Libby (Miller, Cooper, Plame) | and a whole bunch of others
State-by-state rundown of shield laws
Full text of Senate-propsed federal media shield law |
Read: Lewis, chapter 6; Toobin article in New
Yorker on protecting sources; Caldwell's biographical account, from Branzburg case (handout)
Surf: Legal Guide for
Bloggers; CQ special
on federal shield law (pps. 1-15)
Read: Three
Principles of Academic Honesty (Word .doc)
View: Plagiarism tutorial |
Week
7: Feb. 23, 25 |
Finishing source protection, shield and reporter's privilege
Freedom for the thoughts we hate & balancing interests |
Read: Lewis, chapters 9-12 (Tuesday); Chiquita story Thursday)
|
Week
8: March 2, 4 |
Expression on the college campus, and student expression off of it
How to do a legal brief (.doc download)
Also read for Thursday:
USSC update: CLS v. Martinez |
For Tuesday: Brandenburg, Kleindeinst cases in Parker book
For Thursday: Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier in Free Speech on Trial (250-262) and Reno v. ACLU (298-312).
Due Thursday, March 4: First case abstract/legal brief. No outside sources allowed; no Googling. Typed up, printed out and turned in, with honor pledge
(no email). |
Week
9: March 9, 11 |
Establishment Clause | Separation of Church & State
March 13-21: Spring Break! |
Read for Tuesday: Introduction to Establishment Clause (and six subsidiary topics pages linked near the bottom, left side)
Read for Thursday: Pleasant Grove City v. Summum background |
Week
10: March 23, 25 |
Tuesday: Dr. Briggs's visit, community and character building in tension with personal freedom
No class: BC in Chapel Hill |
Read for Tuesday: Protest case before the Supreme Court; Prom controversy
|
Week
11: March 30, April 1 |
Tuesday: Freedom of religion issues and tensions | Litigate CLS v. Martinez
Thursday: Freedom of Information Act, Gathering Information, Sunshine and Access
FOIA Sunshine and Access
|
Read for Tuesday: 1. Madison's "Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments"; 2. Jefferson's Virginia Bill for Religious Freedom in Virginia; 3. John F. Kennedy's Address to Greater Houston Ministerial Association
Read: Georgia
Sunshine Laws; Freedom
of Information Act | How
to File a FOIA Request | How to use FOIA (.pdf download) | Study on FOIA exemptions (.pdf download)
Surf: Searching
public records
Due Monday, March 29: Wandering Rocks blog post
|
Week 12: April 6, 8 |
Resistance & Represssion in the Age of Intellectual Property
Sample
law paper bibliography (need at least 5 peer-reviewed or refereed
law review/journal articles)
|
Read for Tuesday: McCleod, Foreward, Introduction, Chapter 1
Read for Thursday: McCleod, Chapters 2, 3; BC's column on "orphan" works
|
Week
13: April 13, 15 |
60 Minutes of Freedom: Practice run Tuesday in Laughlin 113, the real deal on Thursday, Spruill ballroom, 11am.
60 Minutes of Freedom: April 15, 11-noon, Spruill ballroom |
Due Tuesday, April 13: Second case abstract/legal brief. No outside sources allowed; no Googling. Typed up, printed out and turned in, with honor pledge
(no email).
|
Week
14: April 20, 22 |
McLeod, IP and culture | Post 60 Minutes of Freedom wrap
|
Read: McCleod, Chapters 2-3 (Tuesday); 4,5 (Thursday); op-ed on judicial activism |
Week
15: April 27, 29 |
McLeod, conclusion | wrapping up
Graduation: May 8
Final Exams due Monday, May 3, 5pm, in my office or in my mail slot in the COM office |
McLeod, chapter 6, afterword, epilogue (Tuesday
keep
your eyes on the prize! |
|
Course
Description: Freedom of Expression® (HON 251) examines the origins and uniqueness historically of the First Amendment, the evolution in interpretations of its freedoms over time, and the contemporary challenges to one of the United States’ most basic laws. These challenges include technological change, a seemingly endless war, religious influence in the political sphere, and, as Neil Postman persuasively argued, the ignorance that results from a society’s members “amusing ourselves to death.”
Course Purpose & Objectives: By the end of this course, my goal is for students to demonstrate an understanding and appreciation of the:
- First Amendment and its role in society
- legal and philosophical principles underlying the freedom of expression
- scope and applicability of the First Amendment "free speech" clause, including freedom of expression on the Internet
- lawful limits on freedom of expression
- tensions in society, law and policy that challenge the First Amendment’s vitality
- importance of research for adding new knowledge, and an ability to employ a variety of research techniques for analysis and interpretation
What
you will need (required):
Kembrew McLeod, Freedom of Expression®: Overzealous Copyright Bozos and Other Enemies of Creativity (Doubleday, 2005)
Anthony Lewis, Freedom for the Thought We Hate: A Biography of the First Amendment (Basic Books, 2007)
Richard A. Parker (ed.), Free Speech on Trial (U. of Alabama Press, 2003)
What
you may want (recommended but not required):
Black’s Law Dictionary
Christianity and American Democracy, Hugh Heclo
Freedom of Speech in the United States, Thomas L. Tedford & Dale A. Herbeck
Free Speech on Trial: Communication Perspectives on Landmark Supreme Court Decisions, Richard A. Parker (ed.)
Religious Freedom and the Constitution, Christopher Eisgruber & Lawrence G. Sager
Restoring Free Speech and Liberty on Campus, Donald Alexander Brown
Taking on the Pledge of Allegiance, Ronald Bishop
Policies
• Attendance: Attendance is a part of your grade. Be
here every day on time, just as you would for a job, surgery
or even a haircut. Everyone gets one unexcused absence >> no
questions asked. Stuff happens. After that, unexcused absences
will result in deductions from the "professionalism and
participation" portion of your grade -- one point for
each unexcused absence and/or lateness to class. What is excused
is at the instructor's discretion, so you are best served by
discussing situations and extraordinary circumstances prior
to class whenever possible.
• Distractions: This instructor is easily distracted. Ringing cell phones, therefore, will be lobbed out of the classroom window or run over with a car. Chatter during lecture will result in "professionalism and participation" point deductions, as will Facebooking, texting or any other Internet use during lecture or topic presentations, particularly after warnings have been issued. Do homework for other classes somewhere else. If you have to arrive late or leave early, clear it with the instructor beforehand whenever possible. Basic civility is what is expected. If you are at all unclear as to what “basic civility” implies, the professor would be more than happy to elaborate.
• Preparation: Complete the assignments and be ready to tackle
the activities of the day. Be ready to discuss and debate ideas,
approaches and opinions.
• Deadlines: When
an in-class/in-lab assignment is due, it is due. This reflects
the reality of many mass communication professions and
work environments.
Late in-class assignments will not be accepted unless permission
for extension had been granted prior to deadline. Turn in whatever
has been done by deadline. If we have out-of-class assignments,
they will be accepted for up to one week after deadline, but
late assignments will be
penalized.
Remember, penalized work is not necessarily the same as 0 (zero)
points. Complete out-of-class assignments and learn from them,
even if they are turned in late. After an assignment is more than
a week late, however, that work is not eligible for points.
Please note: If a student misses a class when an assignment is
due and that student has a legitimate excuse, the professor will
accept the late assignment without penalty at his discretion. The
professor defines what constitutes a legitimate excuse and reserves
the right not to grant full credit for assignments turned in under
these circumstances.
• Academic integrity: Because academic integrity is the foundation of college life at Berry, academic dishonesty will result in automatic failure on the assignment in question. Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, the following: cheating, unauthorized collaboration, plagiarism, fabrication, submitting the same work in multiple courses, and aiding and abetting. For definitions of these terms, please consult the instructor. Additionally, violators will be reported in writing to the Provost. Students who are sanctioned for violating the academic integrity policy forfeit the right to withdraw from the class with a grade of “W.”
How
you will be graded:
Blog posts & reading quizzes |
25% |
Abstracts |
10% |
Professionalism, participation, attendance |
10% |
First Amendment in Practice |
25% |
Research project |
30% |
Total |
100% |
To compute
your final grade, add up your point totals, apply the appropriate
percentages, then refer to the grading system summarized here:
A |
93-100 |
A- |
90-92 |
B+ |
88-89 |
B |
83-87 |
B- |
80-82 |
C+ |
78-79 |
C |
73-77 |
C- |
70-72 |
D+ |
68-69 |
D |
60-67 |
F |
59
and below |
|
Definitions
of the grades can be found in the Berry College
Bulletin. “A” students will demonstrate
an outstanding mastery of course material
and will perform far above that required
for credit in the course and far above that usually seen
in the course. The “A” grade should be awarded
sparingly and should identify student performance that
is relatively unusual in the course. |
Berry
Viking code
Academic dishonesty in any form is unacceptable because any breach in
academic integrity, however small, strikes destructively at the college’s
life and work. The code is not just policy, it is foundational to the
academic environment we enjoy and in which scholarship thrives. It is
in force in this classroom.
For the complete Viking Code, please consult the student handbook. In
short, each student is “expected to recognize constituted authority,
to abide by the ordinary rules of good conduct, to be truthful, to respect
the rights of others.” The College’s mission, in part, commits
to a community of integrity and justice. During an era when ethics are
sometimes suspect, there seems no higher goal toward which students ought
to strive than that of personal honor.
Students
with special needs
If you have special needs of any kind, including learning disabilities,
please let me know. Come discuss it with me. I want to make sure on the
front end that we prevent any problems associated with the course. Martha
Van Cise, director of the Academic Support Center, suggests: “Students
with disabilities who believe that they may need accommodation in this
course are encouraged to contact the Academic Support Center in Krannert
Room 301 as soon as possible to ensure that such accommodations are implemented
in a timely fashion.”
Finally,
I believe we are here for a good time, not a long time,
so
let’s have some fun!
|
bc
home | berry
home | email the prof
2010
cubanxgiants.com
This site contains
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. I believe this constitutes a "fair
use" of such material under Title
17, U.S.C. § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from
this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must
obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
|